📄 PDF — HKICPA Handbook Vol II (Code of Ethics)

Open PDF →" data-zh="不支援PDF檢視。打開PDF →">PDF viewer not supported.

🎥 Video Lesson (Coming Soon)
🎬HKFRS 13 - Fair Value Measurement walkthrough video coming soon.

1. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE

1.1 Objective (Paragraphs 1-4)

HKFRS 13 has three primary objectives:

  • Defines fair value as a market-based measurement
  • Establishes a single framework for measuring fair value
  • Requires disclosures about fair value measurements
  • Key Principle: Fair value is a market-based measurement, NOT an entity-specific measurement. The entity's intention to hold an asset or settle a liability is irrelevant when measuring fair value.

    "The objective of a fair value measurement in both cases is the same—to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions (ie an exit price at the measurement date from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability)." (Paragraph 2)

    1.2 Scope (Paragraphs 5-8)

    HKFRS 13 applies when another HKFRS requires or permits:

  • Fair value measurements
  • Disclosures about fair value measurements
  • Measurements based on fair value (e.g., fair value less costs to sell)
  • Exclusions from Measurement and Disclosure Requirements (Paragraph 6):

    ItemReason
    Share-based payment transactions (HKFRS 2)Separate standard governs
    Leasing transactions (HKFRS 16)Separate standard governs
    Net realisable value (HKAS 2)Similar but not fair value
    Value in use (HKAS 36)Similar but not fair value

    Exclusions from Disclosure Requirements Only (Paragraph 7):

  • Plan assets measured at fair value under HKAS 19
  • Retirement benefit plan investments under HKAS 26
  • Assets where recoverable amount is fair value less costs of disposal under HKAS 36
  • Ad Space

    2. MEASUREMENT - DEFINITION AND CORE CONCEPTS

    2.1 Definition of Fair Value (Paragraphs 9-10)

    Fair Value Definition (Paragraph 9): "The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date."

    Critical Characteristics:

  • Exit price - selling price, not purchase price
  • Orderly transaction - not forced or distress sale
  • Market participants - independent, knowledgeable, willing, able
  • Measurement date - current market conditions
  • 2.2 The Asset or Liability (Paragraphs 11-14)

    Characteristics to Consider When Measuring Fair Value:

  • Condition and location of the asset
  • Restrictions on sale or use
  • Whether the asset/liability is stand-alone or part of a group
  • Unit of Account: Determined by the HKFRS requiring or permitting the fair value measurement, not by HKFRS 13 itself.

    2.3 The Transaction (Paragraphs 15-21)

    Principal Market vs. Most Advantageous Market:

    Market TypeDefinition
    Principal MarketMarket with greatest volume and level of activity for the asset/liability
    Most Advantageous MarketMarket that maximises amount received (selling) or minimises amount paid (transferring), after transaction and transport costs

    Key Rules:

  • If a principal market exists, use that price even if another market is more advantageous
  • Entity must have access to the principal/most advantageous market at measurement date
  • Entity does NOT need to be able to sell/transfer on measurement date to use that market's price
  • Presumption: The market where entity normally transacts is the principal/most advantageous market (unless evidence to contrary)
  • Paragraph 18: "If there is a principal market for the asset or liability, the fair value measurement shall represent the price in that market (whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique), even if the price in a different market is potentially more advantageous at the measurement date."

    2.4 Market Participants (Paragraphs 22-23)

    Characteristics of Market Participants:

  • Independent - not related parties
  • Knowledgeable - reasonable understanding using all available information
  • Able - can enter into transaction
  • Willing - motivated but not forced
  • "An entity need not identify specific market participants. Rather, the entity shall identify characteristics that distinguish market participants generally." (Paragraph 23)

    2.5 The Price (Paragraphs 24-26)

    Transaction Costs vs. Transport Costs:

    Cost TypeTreatment
    Transaction CostsNOT included in fair value measurement; accounted for separately under other HKFRSs
    Transport CostsIncluded if location is a characteristic of the asset (e.g., commodity)

    Exit Price Focus: Fair value is always an exit price - the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability.

    Ad Space

    3. APPLICATION TO NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS

    3.1 Highest and Best Use (Paragraphs 27-30)

    Paragraph 27: "A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant's ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use."

    Three Criteria for Highest and Best Use:

    CriterionDescription
    Physically PossiblePhysical characteristics (location, size, etc.)
    Legally PermissibleLegal restrictions (zoning, regulations, etc.)
    Financially FeasibleGenerates adequate income/cash flows for required investment return

    Presumption: Current use is highest and best use unless market or other factors suggest otherwise.

    Defensive Use: Even if entity plans not to use an asset actively (e.g., acquired intangible used defensively), fair value must assume highest and best use by market participants.

    3.2 Valuation Premise (Paragraphs 31-33)

    Two Valuation Premises:

    PremiseDescription
    In-CombinationAsset used with other assets/liabilities as a group (e.g., business)
    Stand-AloneAsset used independently

    Key Point: The fair value measurement assumes the asset is sold consistently with the unit of account specified in other HKFRSs, even when assuming in-combination use.

    Ad Space

    4. APPLICATION TO LIABILITIES AND EQUITY INSTRUMENTS

    4.1 General Principles (Paragraphs 34-36)

    Fair Value Measurement Assumptions for Liabilities/Equity:

  • Liability would remain outstanding - not settled on measurement date
  • Equity instrument would remain outstanding - not cancelled on measurement date
  • Market participant transferee would fulfil the obligation/take on rights
  • 4.2 Liabilities and Equity Held by Other Parties as Assets (Paragraphs 37-39)

    Hierarchy for Measurement When Identical Item is Held as Asset:

    PriorityMethod
    1stQuoted price in active market for identical item held as asset
    2ndOther observable inputs (e.g., quoted price in inactive market)
    3rdOther valuation technique (income approach, market approach)

    Adjustments to Quoted Price: Only if factors specific to the asset are not applicable to the liability/equity measurement.

    4.3 Liabilities and Equity NOT Held by Other Parties as Assets (Paragraphs 40-41)

    Measurement Approach:

  • Use valuation technique from perspective of market participant that owes the liability or has issued the equity claim
  • May use present value technique considering:
  • Future cash outflows for fulfilling obligation
  • Compensation market participant would require for taking on obligation
  • 4.4 Non-Performance Risk (Paragraphs 42-44)

    Paragraph 42: "The fair value of a liability reflects the effect of non-performance risk. Non-performance risk includes, but may not be limited to, an entity's own credit risk."

    Key Points:

  • Non-performance risk assumed to be same before and after transfer
  • Entity's own credit risk (credit standing) must be considered
  • Third-party credit enhancements accounted for separately from liability
  • 4.5 Restriction Preventing Transfer (Paragraphs 45-46)

    Rule: Do NOT include a separate input or adjustment for a restriction preventing transfer of a liability or equity instrument. The effect is already implicitly or explicitly included in other inputs.

    4.6 Financial Liability with Demand Feature (Paragraph 47)

    Paragraph 47: "The fair value of a financial liability with a demand feature (eg a demand deposit) is not less than the amount payable on demand, discounted from the first date that the amount could be required to be paid."

    Ad Space

    5. PORTFOLIO EXCEPTION FOR FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

    5.1 Scope and Conditions (Paragraphs 48-52)

    Exception: Permits measuring fair value of a group of financial assets and liabilities on the basis of net exposure to market risks or credit risk.

    Conditions for Using Exception (Paragraph 49):

  • Manages group on basis of net exposure to particular market risk(s) or counterparty credit risk
  • Provides information on that basis to key management personnel
  • Required or elected to measure those instruments at fair value
  • Accounting Policy Decision: Must be made in accordance with HKAS 8 and applied consistently.

    5.2 Market Risk Exposure (Paragraphs 53-55)

    Requirements:

  • Apply price within bid-ask spread most representative of fair value
  • Market risk(s) must be substantially the same
  • Duration of exposure must be substantially the same
  • Any basis risk must be taken into account
  • 5.3 Credit Risk Exposure (Paragraph 56)

    Requirements:

  • Include effect of net exposure to counterparty credit risk
  • Consider existing arrangements that mitigate credit risk (e.g., master netting agreements, collateral arrangements)
  • Reflect market participants' expectations about legal enforceability
  • Ad Space

    6. FAIR VALUE AT INITIAL RECOGNITION

    6.1 Transaction Price vs. Fair Value (Paragraphs 57-60)

    ConceptDefinition
    Entry PricePrice paid to acquire asset or received to assume liability
    Exit PricePrice received to sell asset or paid to transfer liability

    Key Point: Transaction price often equals fair value, but not always.

    Situations Where Transaction Price May NOT Equal Fair Value (Paragraph B4):

  • Related party transaction (unless evidence of market terms)
  • Transaction under duress or forced sale
  • Different unit of account
  • Different market (e.g., retail vs. dealer market)
  • Recognition of Difference: If another HKFRS requires initial measurement at fair value and transaction price differs, recognise gain or loss in profit or loss unless specified otherwise.

    Ad Space

    7. VALUATION TECHNIQUES

    7.1 General Principles (Paragraphs 61-66)

    Paragraph 61: "An entity shall use valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs."

    7.2 Three Valuation Approaches

    ApproachDescriptionExamples
    Market ApproachUses prices from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets/liabilitiesMarket multiples, matrix pricing
    Cost ApproachReflects current replacement cost to replace service capacityCurrent replacement cost method
    Income ApproachConverts future amounts to single current discounted amountPresent value techniques, option pricing models, multi-period excess earnings method

    7.3 Consistency and Changes

    Rule: Valuation techniques shall be applied consistently.

    Permitted Changes (if result is equally or more representative of fair value):

  • New markets develop
  • New information becomes available
  • Previously used information no longer available
  • Valuation techniques improve
  • Market conditions change
  • Accounting Treatment: Changes in valuation technique accounted for as change in accounting estimate under HKAS 8.

    7.4 Present Value Techniques (Paragraphs B12-B30)

    Components of Present Value Measurement (Paragraph B13):

  • Estimate of future cash flows
  • Expectations about variations in amount/timing
  • Time value of money (risk-free rate)
  • Risk premium for uncertainty
  • Other factors market participants would consider
  • For liabilities: non-performance risk
  • Two Main Present Value Techniques:

    TechniqueDescription
    Discount Rate Adjustment TechniqueUses single set of cash flows (contractual/promised/most likely) and risk-adjusted discount rate
    Expected Present Value Technique - Method 1Risk-adjusted expected cash flows discounted at risk-free rate
    Expected Present Value Technique - Method 2Expected cash flows (not risk-adjusted) discounted at risk-adjusted rate

    General Principles for Present Value (Paragraph B14):

  • Cash flows and discount rates should reflect market participant assumptions
  • Only factors attributable to asset/liability being measured
  • No double-counting or omitting risk factors
  • Internal consistency (nominal with nominal, real with real)
  • Discount rates consistent with currency of cash flows
  • Ad Space

    8. INPUTS TO VALUATION TECHNIQUES

    8.1 General Principles (Paragraphs 67-69)

    Paragraph 67: "Valuation techniques used to measure fair value shall maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs."

    Types of Markets (Paragraph B34):

    Market TypeDescription
    Exchange MarketsClosing prices readily available (e.g., stock exchange)
    Dealer MarketsDealers trade for own account, provide liquidity (e.g., OTC markets)
    Brokered MarketsBrokers match buyers/sellers (e.g., real estate)
    Principal-to-Principal MarketsTransactions negotiated independently (e.g., private placements)

    8.2 Bid-Ask Spread (Paragraphs 70-71)

    Rule: Use price within bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value. Use of bid prices for assets and ask prices for liabilities is permitted but not required. Mid-market pricing is also permitted.

    8.3 Premiums and Discounts (Paragraph 69)

    Permitted: Premiums/discounts consistent with unit of account (e.g., control premium for controlling interest)

    NOT Permitted: Blockage factors - adjustments reflecting size of entity's holding relative to normal trading volume

    Ad Space

    9. FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

    9.1 Overview (Paragraphs 72-75)

    Paragraph 72: "The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 inputs) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs)."

    Hierarchy Summary:

    LevelInput TypePriority
    Level 1Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical itemsHighest
    Level 2Observable inputs other than Level 1 (directly or indirectly)Medium
    Level 3Unobservable inputsLowest

    Categorisation Rule (Paragraph 73): Fair value measurement categorised in its entirety based on the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement.

    9.2 Level 1 Inputs (Paragraphs 76-80)

    Definition: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.

    Key Rules:

  • Most reliable evidence of fair value
  • Must be used without adjustment whenever available
  • Exceptions to Adjustment (Paragraph 79):
  • Large number of similar assets/liabilities (practical expedient - alternative pricing method)
  • Quoted price does not represent fair value at measurement date (e.g., events after market close)
  • Liability/equity measured using quoted price of identical item traded as asset (adjustment for factors specific to item)
  • Blockage Factor: NOT permitted for Level 1. Fair value = quoted price × quantity held, even if normal daily trading volume insufficient.

    9.3 Level 2 Inputs (Paragraphs 81-85)

    Definition: Inputs other than quoted prices in Level 1 that are observable for the asset/liability, directly or indirectly.

    Examples:

  • Quoted prices for similar assets/liabilities in active markets
  • Quoted prices for identical/similar items in inactive markets
  • Observable inputs: interest rates, yield curves, implied volatilities, credit spreads
  • Market-corroborated inputs
  • Term Requirement: For specified (contractual) term, Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term.

    Adjustments: May be necessary for condition/location, comparability, or volume/activity level. Significant adjustments using unobservable inputs may result in Level 3 categorisation.

    9.4 Level 3 Inputs (Paragraphs 86-90)

    Definition: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

    Key Requirements:

  • Reflect assumptions market participants would use
  • Include assumptions about risk
  • Develop using best information available (may include entity's own data)
  • Adjust entity's own data if market participants would use different data
  • Risk Adjustment: Must be included if market participants would include one. A measurement without risk adjustment does not represent fair value.

    Ad Space

    10. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

    10.1 Overall Objectives (Paragraphs 91-92)

    Disclosure Objectives:

  • For assets/liabilities measured at fair value (recurring or non-recurring): valuation techniques and inputs used
  • For recurring Level 3 measurements: effect on profit or loss or OCI
  • 10.2 Minimum Disclosure Requirements (Paragraph 93)

    For Each Class of Assets and Liabilities:

    RequirementDescription
    (a)Fair value at end of reporting period; for non-recurring: reasons for measurement
    (b)Level in fair value hierarchy (1, 2, or 3)
    (c)Transfers between Level 1 and 2 (recurring only) - amounts, reasons, policy
    (d)Description of valuation techniques and inputs used (Level 2 and 3); quantitative info about significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
    (e)Level 3 reconciliation (recurring only) - opening to closing balances
    (f)Level 3 unrealised gains/losses (recurring only)
    (g)Description of valuation processes (Level 3)
    (h)Sensitivity analysis (Level 3 recurring) - narrative description; for financial instruments: quantitative effect of reasonably possible alternative assumptions
    (i)If highest and best use differs from current use (non-financial assets)

    10.3 Determining Classes (Paragraph 94)

    Basis for Determining Classes:

  • Nature, characteristics, and risks of asset/liability
  • Level of fair value hierarchy
  • Greater disaggregation needed for Level 3 measurements
  • 10.4 Transfer Policy (Paragraph 95)

    Policy for Determining When Transfers Occur: Must be disclosed and consistently followed. Same policy for transfers into and out of levels.

    Examples of Timing Policies:

  • Date of event/change in circumstances
  • Beginning of reporting period
  • End of reporting period
  • 10.5 Additional Disclosures

    For Assets/Liabilities NOT Measured at Fair Value but Fair Value Disclosed (Paragraph 97):

  • Level in hierarchy
  • Description of valuation techniques and inputs
  • If highest and best use differs from current use
  • For Liabilities with Third-Party Credit Enhancement (Paragraph 98):

  • Existence of credit enhancement
  • Whether reflected in fair value measurement
  • Format (Paragraph 99): Quantitative disclosures in tabular format unless another format is more appropriate.

    Ad Space

    11. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITION

    11.1 Effective Date (Paragraph C1)

  • Annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013
  • Earlier application permitted
  • 11.2 Transition (Paragraphs C2-C3)

  • Prospective application from beginning of annual period of initial application
  • Comparative information for periods before initial application need not include HKFRS 13 disclosures
  • Ad Space

    KEY TAKEAWAYS SUMMARY

    ConceptKey Point
    Fair Value DefinitionExit price - price to sell asset or transfer liability in orderly transaction between market participants at measurement date
    Market vs. Entity-SpecificMarket-based measurement; entity's intention irrelevant
    Principal MarketGreatest volume and activity; use its price even if another market more advantageous
    Highest and Best UsePhysically possible, legally permissible, financially feasible; from market participant perspective
    Non-Performance RiskIncludes entity's own credit risk; assumed same before and after transfer
    Valuation TechniquesMaximise observable inputs, minimise unobservable inputs
    Fair Value HierarchyLevel 1 (highest) → Level 2 → Level 3 (lowest); categorised by lowest significant input
    Blockage FactorNOT permitted
    Transaction CostsNOT included in fair value
    Transport CostsIncluded if location is characteristic
    Portfolio ExceptionPermitted for financial assets/liabilities managed on net exposure basis
    DisclosuresExtensive for Level 3 measurements including reconciliation and sensitivity

    Ad Space

    ---

    ❓ Ready to Test Your Knowledge?

    50 MCQs covering all sections. Timed at 1.25 min each (62.5 min total).

    📝 Start Q&A →🖨️ Save as PDF